Facilitating SSDI Fraud

supervisor · 05-19-2011, 08:14 am

SSDI was established as a source of income for persons who are so severely disabled that they cannot perform any meaningful work that exists in the national economy. The program, which allocates funds directly from Social Security general revenues, was never intended to be as broad and expensive as it is today. Yet current SSDI payments account for 14 percent of all Social Security distributions. In 1999 alone, SSDI handed out a staggering $57 billion in disability benefits. Further, the federal government maintains dozens of programs that raise the amount handed to persons with various degrees of disability to an annual grand total of $110 billion.

A review of SSDI cases and a look at SSDI statistics show a clear pattern of SSA officials’ turning a blind eye to all standards and common sense when passing out benefits. For example, SSA officials frequently award full SSDI benefits to persons who pursue disability discrimination claims under the Americans with Disabilities Act. However, to assert an ADA claim, a Plaintiff must argue that he is fully capable of performing a desired job. How can a person be simultaneously able and unable to work? Worse yet, in many cases SSA awards SSDI benefits to persons whose ADA claims were dismissed precisely because the per-sons were not.

SSDI was established as a source of income for persons who are so severely disabled that they cannot perform any meaningful work that exists in the national economy. The program, which allocates funds directly from Social Security general revenues, was never intended to be as broad and expensive as it is today. Yet current SSDI payments account for 14 percent of all Social Security distributions. In 1999 alone, SSDI handed out a staggering $57 billion in disability benefits. Further, the federal government maintains dozens of programs that raise the amount handed to persons with various degrees of disability to an annual grand total of $110 billion.

A review of SSDI cases and a look at SSDI statistics show a clear pattern of SSA officials’ turning a blind eye to all standards and common sense when passing out benefits. For example, SSA officials frequently award full SSDI benefits to persons who pursue disability discrimination claims under the Americans with Disabilities Act. However, to assert an ADA claim, a Plaintiff must argue that he is fully capable of performing a desired job. How can a person be simultaneously able and unable to work? Worse yet, in many cases SSA awards SSDI benefits to persons whose ADA claims were dismissed precisely because the per-sons were not disabled, even under the ADA’s more lenient definition of 'disability'.

Despite very strict SSDI eligibility standards, SSA has opened the floodgates to innumerable, profligate benefit awards. For example, SSA is currently paying a medical doctor to remain at home simply because he prefers administrative work, which he can perform with very minor difficulty, to treating patients, which he can perform with no difficulty at all. This and numerous other cases documented in this study demonstrate how persons who have very minor impairments and who would have little or no difficulty remaining in the workforce are never-the-less collecting billions of dollars in SSDI benefits each year. To slow the drain of Social Security funds, policymakers must stop abuses of SSDI that are facilitated by SSA itself disabled, even under the ADA’s more lenient definition of disability.

Read the full text attached!

Similar
Thread	Author	Location	Replies	Post
White Collar Crime	supervisor	Industry Articles	0	11-02-2011 07:58 am
SSDI and SSI Applications	supervisor	Industry Articles	0	02-05-2011 09:17 am
New Video: Workers Comp Fraud Training	supervisor	Automated Notices	0	09-16-2010 06:45 pm
Welfare Fraud	supervisor	PI Wiki	0	08-09-2010 06:26 pm
Report Employer Fraud	supervisor	ZMI Announcements	0	07-25-2010 07:07 am